CASE:
A small firm ...basically a software firm which started in 2005 with 30 employees had some rules as a company policy.only candidates with one yr experience were taken in to the company .in 2011 the company grew to 700 employees and in the company review it is known that some of the candidates are with fake profiles and fake experiences.some company fired such people and in deep survey it is known that almost 70 % people are with fake experiences.some company thought of changing its policy ...
Now u being a HR manager
1.wat will u do against these fake profiles ?
2.will u alter/change the company policy ?
Now as discussed in the earlier blog we were given 2 min to think of ourselves and then 10 min discussion started .it is a group of 10 people .with 3 freshers and 7 work ex people. As usual i stick to my GD tricks and i didnt started it and 2 fought for the start and it went on .not a fish market at all . i entered as number 3 and shooted out 3-4 new points through which the discussion carried on
after the discussion every individual was given 1 min to conclude and 1.5 min to write the conclusions
the conclusions we arrived at are
*Do not change the company policy else go for the alteration that instead of 1 yr experience go for candidates with certified courses
*Take the assistance of NSR and NAASCOM for the background check of candidates
*Take the assistance ant tie up with job portals like FRESHERSWORLD.COM which can provide freshers bcoz going for campus placements to a small company is cost incurred process
*Grill the candidates in interviews
*Black list the companies which provide fake experiences
and thus ended the case study and GD
I had a good value added points like job portal assistance and grill through interviews.
A very good case and followed by the interview .Do not forget that Interview panel are the judges to the GD is well .So ur GD reflects your interview.
